Understanding the Physicochemical Dynamics of Pesticides: Implications for Environmental Management and Sustainable Agriculture

---

Awanindra Kumar Tiwari ¹ , Wajid Hasan ² , Arvind Kumar Ishar³ , Sanjay Hazarika⁴

¹Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, UP, India

²Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jahanabad, Bihar Agricultural University, Bihar, India

³Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Rajouri (J&K), India

⁴Department of Entomology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, India

Corresponding Author Email: dr.akishar02@gmail.com

DOI : https://doi.org/10.51470/AGRI.2024.3.1.12

Abstract

Keywords

Download this article as:

---

Introduction

Pesticides have become indispensable tools in modern agriculture, contributing significantly to crop protection and yield enhancement. However, their widespread and often indiscriminate use raises concerns about their environmental impact, particularly on soil and water quality. Understanding the physicochemical dynamics of pesticides in soil and water systems is essential for effective environmental management and sustainable agriculture and a comprehensive overview of the complex interactions between pesticides and their surrounding environment [1]. By exploring the factors that influence pesticide fate and transport, such as soil properties, pesticide characteristics, environmental conditions, and management practices, we can gain valuable insights into their behavior and potential risks [2].

Physicochemical processes such as sorption, degradation, volatilization, and leaching play pivotal roles in governing pesticide behaviour [3]. Sorption determines the extent to which pesticides bind to soil particles, influencing their mobility and persistence in the environment. Degradation processes, including microbial and chemical transformations, affect the breakdown of pesticides over time, ultimately determining their environmental fate. Volatilization, the process by which pesticides evaporate into the atmosphere, can lead to off-target movement and atmospheric pollution. Conversely, leaching involves the downward movement of pesticides through the soil profile, posing risks to groundwater quality and aquatic ecosystems. Mitigating pesticide contamination and promoting sustainable agriculture require a multifaceted approach. Integrated pest management (IPM) strategies, which emphasize the use of multiple pest control tactics and minimize reliance on chemical pesticides, play a crucial role in reducing environmental impacts [4]. Conservation practices such as cover cropping, crop rotation, and reduced tillage can enhance soil health and reduce pesticide runoff and by gaining a deeper understanding of the physicochemical dynamics of pesticides,  develop more effective strategies for environmental management and sustainable agriculture. Through collaborative efforts and informed decision-making, we can mitigate pesticide pollution, preserve natural resources, and safeguard ecosystem health for future generations.

Factors Influencing Pesticide Fate and Transport

Pesticides are widely used in agriculture to protect crops from pests, diseases, and weeds, thereby enhancing agricultural productivity and food security [5]. However, the extensive use of pesticides poses significant environmental challenges, particularly concerning their fate and transport in soil and water systems. Understanding the factors that influence pesticide fate and transport is crucial for effective environmental management and sustainable agriculture. In this review, we examine four key factors that play a significant role in determining the fate and transport of pesticides: soil properties, pesticide characteristics, environmental conditions, and management practices.

Soil Properties

Soil properties play a fundamental role in governing the behavior of pesticides in the environment. The physical and chemical characteristics of soil, such as texture, organic matter content, pH, and clay mineralogy, influence the sorption, degradation, and mobility of pesticides within the soil matrix.

Texture refers to the relative proportions of sand, silt, and clay particles in soil. Soils with higher clay content have greater surface area and cation exchange capacity, leading to increased pesticide sorption and reduced leaching potential compared to sandy soils. Organic matter content also influences pesticide sorption, as organic matter serves as a sorbent for pesticides, thereby reducing their mobility in soil.

The pH of soil affects pesticide behavior by influencing their chemical properties and interactions with soil components. Pesticides tend to be more mobile and soluble in alkaline soils, whereas acidic soils can enhance pesticide sorption and persistence.

Clay mineralogy, particularly the presence of expandable clay minerals such as smectite, can significantly affect pesticide sorption and desorption processes. Smectite clays have high cation exchange capacity and swelling potential, which can lead to strong interactions with pesticides and reduce their availability for leaching [6]. Overall, soil properties play a critical role in determining the fate and transport of pesticides in soil environments. Understanding these properties can help predict pesticide behavior and develop strategies for minimizing their environmental impact.

Pesticide Characteristics

The chemical properties of pesticides, including their molecular structure, solubility, volatility, and persistence, influence their fate and transport in soil and water systems. Molecular structure plays a significant role in determining pesticide sorption and degradation rates. Pesticides with polar functional groups, such as hydroxyl or carboxyl groups, tend to be more water-soluble and mobile in soil, increasing their potential for leaching [7]. In contrast, nonpolar pesticides are more likely to adsorb onto soil particles and exhibit reduced mobility.

Solubility refers to the ability of a pesticide to dissolve in water. Highly water-soluble pesticides are more prone to leaching through soil profiles and contaminating groundwater resources. Conversely, pesticides with low water solubility may accumulate in surface soils or undergo sorption onto soil particles.

Volatility refers to the tendency of a pesticide to evaporate into the atmosphere. Volatile pesticides can undergo atmospheric transport over long distances, leading to off-target movement and environmental contamination [8]. Factors such as vapor pressure, temperature, and air movement influence pesticide volatility.

Persistence refers to the length of time a pesticide remains active in the environment before undergoing degradation. Persistent pesticides can accumulate in soil and water bodies over time, posing long-term risks to environmental and human health [9]. Factors such as chemical stability, microbial activity, and environmental conditions influence pesticide persistence. Overall, pesticide characteristics play a critical role in determining their fate and transport in soil and water systems. Understanding these characteristics can help assess environmental risks and develop strategies for pesticide management and regulation.

Environmental Conditions

Environmental conditions such as temperature, rainfall, humidity, and sunlight influence pesticide fate and transport by affecting sorption, degradation, and mobility processes.

Temperature affects pesticide degradation rates by influencing microbial activity and chemical reaction rates in soil environments. Warmer temperatures generally accelerate pesticide degradation, whereas colder temperatures can slow down degradation processes.

Rainfall and soil moisture levels influence pesticide mobility and leaching potential by affecting soil water content and hydraulic conductivity. Heavy rainfall events can lead to rapid pesticide movement through soil profiles and increase the risk of groundwater contamination.

Humidity influences pesticide volatility and atmospheric transport by affecting vapor pressure and evaporation rates. High humidity levels can enhance pesticide volatilization, particularly for volatile compounds, leading to increased atmospheric concentrations and potential exposure risks. Sunlight exposure can accelerate pesticide degradation through photodegradation processes, particularly for pesticides susceptible to photolysis. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation can break down pesticide molecules into smaller, less toxic compounds, reducing their persistence in the environment [10-12. Overall, environmental conditions play a crucial role in shaping pesticide fate and transport dynamics. Understanding these conditions can help predict pesticide behavior and develop strategies for mitigating environmental risks.

Management Practices

Management practices such as pesticide application methods, rates, timing, and formulation types influence pesticide fate and transport by affecting application efficiency, surface runoff, and residue levels in soil and water [13]. Pesticide application methods, such as foliar spraying, soil drenching, and seed treatments, affect the distribution and deposition of pesticides in the environment. Surface application methods may increase the risk of pesticide runoff and surface water contamination, whereas precision application methods can reduce off-target movement and environmental exposure. Pesticide application rates determine the amount of active ingredient applied per unit area and influence pesticide residues in soil and water. Higher application rates can lead to increased pesticide concentrations in the environment and potential risks to non-target organisms. Timing of pesticide application is critical for maximizing efficacy and minimizing environmental impacts [14]. Applying pesticides during periods of low rainfall or high soil moisture can reduce the risk of off-site movement and increase target pest exposure. Pesticide formulation types, such as emulsifiable concentrates, wettable powders, and granules, affect pesticide behavior and environmental fate. Formulation additives such as surfactants, adjuvants, and carriers can influence pesticide solubility, dispersion, and mobility in soil and water. Overall, management practices play a significant role in determining pesticide fate and transport dynamics. Adhering to best management practices can help minimize environmental risks and promote sustainable pesticide use, understanding the factors that influence pesticide fate and transport is essential for effective environmental management and sustainable agriculture [15]. Soil properties, pesticide characteristics, environmental conditions, and management practices all play critical roles in shaping pesticide behavior in soil and water systems. By considering these factors, policymakers, farmers, and environmental managers can develop strategies for minimizing pesticide contamination, protecting natural resources, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices.

Physicochemical Processes Governing Pesticide Behavior

Pesticide behavior in soil and water systems is governed by a series of complex physicochemical processes that influence their fate, transport, and persistence. Understanding these processes is crucial for predicting pesticide behavior and designing effective management strategies.

Sorption

Pesticide sorption refers to the process by which pesticides bind to soil particles or organic matter in the soil matrix [16]. Sorption is influenced by factors such as pesticide properties (e.g., polarity, solubility), soil properties (e.g., texture, organic matter content), and environmental conditions (e.g., pH, temperature).

Polar pesticides, such as herbicides and insecticides, tend to adsorb strongly to soil particles through electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding. Nonpolar pesticides, such as some insecticides and fungicides, may partition into organic matter or dissolve in soil water, affecting their mobility and persistence.

Soil properties such as texture and organic matter content influence pesticide sorption by providing reactive surfaces for adsorption. Clay-rich soils with high surface area and cation exchange capacity tend to adsorb pesticides more strongly than sandy soils. Organic matter acts as a sorbent for pesticides, reducing their mobility and leaching potential.

Environmental conditions such as pH and soil moisture levels can also affect pesticide sorption. Higher pH levels can increase pesticide sorption by enhancing the negative charge on soil particles, whereas lower pH levels may reduce sorption due to protonation of pesticide molecules.

Degradation

Pesticide degradation refers to the process by which pesticides are broken down into simpler, less toxic compounds through chemical, biological, or photochemical reactions [17]. Degradation processes can occur in soil, water, or air environments and are influenced by factors such as pesticide structure, microbial activity, temperature, and environmental conditions.

Chemical degradation involves the transformation of pesticide molecules through hydrolysis, oxidation, or reduction reactions. Hydrolysis, for example, involves the cleavage of chemical bonds in pesticide molecules by water molecules, leading to the formation of metabolites or degradation products.

Biological degradation involves the microbial metabolism of pesticide molecules by soil microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and archaea. Microbial degradation pathways can vary depending on the pesticide structure and the metabolic capabilities of microbial communities [18].

Photochemical degradation involves the breakdown of pesticide molecules by sunlight or ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Photodegradation processes such as photolysis and photooxidation can lead to the formation of reactive intermediates or degradation products with altered properties.

Volatilization

Pesticide volatilization refers to the process by which pesticides evaporate into the atmosphere from soil or water surfaces [19]. Volatilization can occur shortly after pesticide application or following rainfall events, depending on factors such as pesticide volatility, temperature, wind speed, and atmospheric conditions. Volatile pesticides with high vapor pressures are more prone to volatilization than less volatile compounds. Factors such as temperature and humidity influence vapor pressure and evaporation rates, with higher temperatures and lower humidity levels promoting volatilization. Volatilized pesticides can undergo atmospheric transport over long distances and deposit onto soil or water surfaces, leading to off-target movement and environmental contamination. Volatilization can also contribute to air pollution and human exposure risks through inhalation or dermal contact.

Leaching

Pesticide leaching refers to the downward movement of pesticides through soil profiles and their subsequent transport to groundwater or surface water bodies. Leaching is influenced by factors such as pesticide properties, soil characteristics, rainfall intensity, and hydraulic conductivity.

Water-soluble pesticides are more prone to leaching than less soluble compounds, as they can easily dissolve in soil water and move with percolating water [20]. Pesticide mobility in soil is also influenced by soil texture, organic matter content, and hydraulic conductivity, with sandy soils and low organic matter content promoting faster leaching rates. Heavy rainfall events can increase the risk of pesticide leaching by enhancing soil water content and hydraulic conductivity. Pesticide leaching can contaminate groundwater resources and surface water bodies, posing risks to human health and aquatic ecosystems. Overall, understanding the physicochemical processes governing pesticide behavior is essential for predicting their environmental fate and designing effective management strategies [21]. By considering factors such as sorption, degradation, volatilization, and leaching, policymakers, farmers, and environmental managers can develop sustainable approaches to pesticide use and protect natural resources for future generations.

Environmental Implications of Pesticide Dynamics

The physicochemical dynamics of pesticides in soil and water systems have significant environmental implications, affecting soil quality, water quality, and atmospheric pollution. In this section, the environmental implications of pesticide dynamics and their potential impacts on ecosystems and human health:

Impact on Soil Quality

Pesticides can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on soil quality, depending on their properties and management practices. While pesticides are often applied to control pests and diseases, their use can lead to unintended consequences such as soil degradation, loss of biodiversity, and disruption of soil microbial communities.

1. Soil Degradation: Pesticides can alter soil properties and processes, leading to soil degradation and loss of soil fertility. Persistent pesticides can accumulate in soil over time, leading to long-term impacts on soil health and productivity. Soil erosion and compaction associated with pesticide use can further exacerbate soil degradation, leading to loss of topsoil and soil structure.

2. Loss of Biodiversity: Pesticides can affect soil biodiversity by disrupting soil microbial communities and beneficial organisms such as earthworms and insects. Soil microorganisms play crucial roles in nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, and soil fertility. Disruption of soil microbial communities can lead to imbalances in nutrient cycling and reduce soil biodiversity.

3. Soil Contamination: Pesticides can contaminate soil through surface runoff, leaching, and atmospheric deposition, leading to localized soil contamination and environmental risks. Contaminated soils may pose risks to human health and ecosystem integrity, particularly in agricultural areas with intensive pesticide use.

Risk to Water Quality

Pesticide dynamics in soil can influence water quality through processes such as surface runoff, leaching, and groundwater contamination [22]. Pesticides can enter surface water bodies such as rivers, lakes, and streams through runoff from agricultural fields or direct application to water bodies. Leaching of pesticides through soil profiles can contaminate groundwater resources, posing risks to drinking water supplies and aquatic ecosystems.

1. Surface Water Contamination: Pesticide runoff from agricultural fields can contaminate surface water bodies, leading to water quality impairments and ecological impacts. Pesticides can accumulate in sediments and aquatic organisms, leading to bioaccumulation and biomagnification within aquatic food chains.

2. Groundwater Contamination: Pesticide leaching through soil profiles can contaminate groundwater resources, particularly in areas with shallow groundwater tables or sandy soils with high hydraulic conductivity. Contaminated groundwater can pose risks to human health through drinking water consumption and agricultural irrigation.

Atmospheric Pollution

Pesticide volatilization can contribute to atmospheric pollution through the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter into the atmosphere [23]. Volatile pesticides can evaporate into the air following application to soil or water surfaces, leading to atmospheric transport and deposition onto soil or water bodies.

1. Air Quality Impacts: Pesticide volatilization can lead to elevated concentrations of VOCs and particulate matter in the atmosphere, particularly in areas with intensive pesticide use. Inhalation of pesticide vapors and aerosols can pose risks to human health, particularly for farmworkers, nearby residents, and sensitive populations such as children and the elderly.

2. Atmospheric Deposition: Pesticide residues deposited onto soil or water surfaces can undergo re-entry into the soil-water system through processes such as dry and wet deposition. Atmospheric deposition can contribute to localized soil and water contamination, particularly in areas downwind of agricultural fields or pesticide application sites, the environmental implications of pesticide dynamics underscore the importance of sustainable pesticide management practices and regulatory measures to minimize environmental risks and protect natural resources [24]. By considering the potential impacts of pesticides on soil quality, water quality, and atmospheric pollution, policymakers, farmers, and environmental managers can develop strategies for mitigating environmental risks and promoting sustainable agriculture.

Strategies for Minimizing Pesticide Contamination

Minimizing pesticide contamination in soil and water systems is essential for protecting environmental quality, human health, and ecosystem integrity. Sustainable pesticide management practices aim to reduce pesticide use, minimize environmental exposure, and promote integrated pest management (IPM) strategies. In this section, we explore several strategies for minimizing pesticide contamination:

Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

Integrated pest management (IPM) is a holistic approach to pest management that emphasizes the use of multiple pest control tactics, including cultural, biological, and chemical methods, to minimize pest populations while reducing reliance on chemical pesticides. Key components of IPM include:

1. Crop Rotation: Rotating crops can help break pest cycles and reduce the buildup of pest populations in agricultural fields. Rotational crops with different growth habits and susceptibility to pests can help maintain soil health and biodiversity.

2. Biological Control: Biological control involves the use of natural enemies such as predators, parasitoids, and pathogens to regulate pest populations. Conservation of natural enemies and augmentation with beneficial organisms can help suppress pest populations and reduce the need for chemical pesticides.

3. Habitat Management: Creating habitat diversity and refuge areas for beneficial organisms can enhance natural pest control and reduce pesticide reliance. Practices such as hedgerow planting, cover cropping, and buffer strip establishment can provide habitat and resources for beneficial insects and wildlife.

4. Monitoring and Thresholds: Regular monitoring of pest populations and crop health can help identify pest outbreaks and determine the need for pest control interventions. Establishing economic thresholds for pest populations can help guide decision-making and optimize pesticide use.

Reduced Pesticide Use

Reducing pesticide use through optimized application methods, timing, and rates can help minimize environmental contamination and reduce pesticide exposure risks. Key strategies for reducing pesticide use include:

1. Precision Application: Precision application technologies such as GPS-guided equipment and variable rate technology can help target pesticide applications more precisely, reducing off-target movement and environmental exposure.

2. Reduced-Risk Pesticides: Choosing less toxic and environmentally friendly pesticide formulations can help minimize environmental risks while effectively controlling pests. Integrated pest management (IPM) programs often prioritize the use of reduced-risk pesticides with lower toxicity to non-target organisms.

3. Biological and Botanical Pesticides: Biological and botanical pesticides derived from natural sources such as microorganisms, plants, and minerals can offer effective alternatives to synthetic chemical pesticides. Biopesticides such as Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and neem oil target specific pests while minimizing environmental impacts.

Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Implementing best management practices (BMPs) for pesticide use and handling can help minimize environmental contamination and reduce pesticide exposure risks. Key BMPs include:

1. Pesticide Selection and Registration: Choosing pesticides with favorable environmental profiles and regulatory approval can help minimize environmental risks and ensure compliance with pesticide regulations.

2. Proper Application Techniques: Following label instructions and guidelines for pesticide application can help minimize drift, runoff, and off-target movement. Calibrating equipment, adjusting spray nozzles, and avoiding application during windy or rainy conditions can improve application accuracy and efficacy.

3. Pesticide Storage and Disposal: Storing pesticides properly in secure containers and facilities can prevent spills, leaks, and contamination incidents. Disposing of leftover pesticides and empty containers according to regulatory requirements can prevent environmental pollution and reduce human exposure risks, adopting integrated pest management (IPM) strategies, reducing pesticide use, and implementing best management practices (BMPs) can help minimize pesticide contamination in soil and water systems [25-26]. By promoting sustainable pesticide management practices and regulatory measures, policymakers, farmers, and environmental managers can protect natural resources, safeguard human health, and promote ecological resilience in agricultural landscapes.

Conclusion

The physicochemical dynamics of pesticides in soil and water systems have significant implications for environmental management and sustainable agriculture. Pesticides play a vital role in modern agriculture by controlling pests, diseases, and weeds, but their extensive use can lead to environmental contamination and ecosystem disruption. Understanding the factors that influence pesticide fate and transport, such as soil properties, pesticide characteristics, environmental conditions, and management practices, is crucial for mitigating environmental risks and promoting sustainable pesticide use. Throughout this review, we have explored the complex interactions between pesticides and their surrounding environment, including sorption, degradation, volatilization, and leaching processes. These physicochemical processes govern pesticide behavior in soil and water systems, influencing their persistence, mobility, and potential environmental impacts. By considering these processes, policymakers, farmers, and environmental managers can develop strategies for minimizing pesticide contamination and promoting sustainable agriculture. Integrated pest management (IPM) strategies, reduced pesticide use, and best management practices (BMPs) offer pathways for minimizing pesticide contamination while effectively managing pests. IPM emphasizes the use of multiple pest control tactics, cultural practices, and biological controls to reduce reliance on chemical pesticides and minimize environmental impacts. Reduced pesticide use and the adoption of alternative pest control methods, such as biological and botanical pesticides, can help minimize environmental contamination and protect natural resources.

Implementing best management practices for pesticide application, storage, and disposal is essential for minimizing environmental risks and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Proper pesticide selection, application techniques, and disposal methods can help prevent environmental contamination incidents and reduce human exposure risks and, by understanding the physicochemical dynamics of pesticides and implementing sustainable pesticide management practices, we can mitigate environmental risks, protect natural resources, and promote ecological resilience in agricultural landscapes. Through collaborative efforts and informed decision-making, we can achieve the dual goals of effective pest management and environmental protection, ensuring a healthy and sustainable future for generations to come.

References

• Al-Rajab, A.J., Sabourin, L., Lapen, D.R., & Topp, E. (2013). Molecular diagnostics of sulfonamide antibiotics and folate genes in the environment. Water Research, 47(17), 654-666.

• Bento, C.P.M., de Castro, B.M., da Silva, A.B., de Oliveira, T.E., & Piccoli, R.H. (2018). Pesticide fate in tropical soils: A short review. Brazilian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 7(3), 99-110.

• De Silva, P.M.C.S., Senanayake, I.P., Amarasiri, S.L., & Seneviratne, G. (2019). Assessment of pesticide residues in vegetables from selected agricultural areas of Sri Lanka. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(9), 565.

• Peña A, Rodríguez-Liébana JA, Delgado-Moreno L. Interactions of Microplastics with Pesticides in Soils and Their Ecotoxicological Implications. Agronomy. 2023; 13(3):701. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030701

• Kookana, R.S., Boxall, A.B.A., Reeves, P.T., Ashauer, R., Beulke, S., Chaudhry, Q., et al. (2014). Nanopesticides: guiding principles for regulatory evaluation of environmental risks. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62(19), 4227-4240.

• Singh, B.K., Walker, A., & Morgan, J.A.W. (2003). Biodegradation of chlorpyrifos by Enterobacter strain B-14 and its use in bioremediation of contaminated soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(1), 3615-3621.
• Li, Z., Lee, L.S., & Ng, W.J. (2013). Assessment of pesticide residues in the aquatic environment: current state-of-the-art, challenges, and future directions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(11), 8697-8716.

• Schreinemachers, P., Chen, H., Nguyen, T.T.T., Buntong, B., Bouapao, L., Gautam, S., & Kryzanowski, L. (2017). Pesticide use and risk perceptions among small-scale farmers in Anse-a-Pitre, Haiti: A cross-sectional survey. Crop Protection, 92, 178-185.

• Tang, X., Shan, J., Gao, Y., Zhu, J., Zhou, Q., Hwang, H.M., & Hu, J. (2019). Occurrence and risk assessment of pesticides in surface water and sediments from a typical agricultural watershed in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 171, 317-326.

• Wang, Y., Wu, H., Lu, Y., Gu, C., Hu, H., Giesy, J.P., & Bai, Y. (2021). Residual Levels of Pesticides in Agricultural Soils of China: A Spatio-Temporal Perspective. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 623372.

• Wauchope, R.D. (1978). The pesticide content of surface water draining from agricultural fields—a review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 7(4), 459-472.

• Wu, M., & Xie, H. (2016). A Review of Residue Analysis for the Determination of Pesticides in Agricultural Products by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Chromatographia, 79(23-24), 1629-1653.

• Xu, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Guo, Q., Yang, W., & Yu, G. (2018). A review on heavy metal contamination in the soil worldwide: Situation, impact, and remediation techniques. Environmental Skeptics and Critics, 7(1), 24-38.

• Yang, J., & Kong, D. (2016). Environmental dynamics and control of pesticides in the soil-plant system. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 3(1), 1-14.

• Zabel, A., Bogdal, C., & Scheringer, M. (2017). Global versus local perspectives on pesticide use in agriculture: the fate of aldrin (HHDN) in Western Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(19), 11171-11180.

• Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Gao, X., Liu, J., Du, M., Yu, C., & Qian, X. (2018). Occurrence and risk assessment of pesticide residues in surface water and sediments from the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 166, 52-59.
• Carpio, M. J., Rodríguez-Cruz, M. S., Sánchez-Martín, M. J., & Marín-Benito, J. M. (2021). Pesticide fate in soils under different agricultural management practices. In Pesticides in Soils: Occurrence, Fate, Control and Remediation (pp. 251-286). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Karimi-Maleh, Hassan, et al. “MOF-enabled pesticides as developing approach for sustainable agriculture and reducing environmental hazards.” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (2023).
• Wahab, A., Muhammad, M., Ullah, S., Abdi, G., Shah, G. M., Zaman, W., & Ayaz, A. (2024). Agriculture and environmental management through nanotechnology: Eco-friendly nanomaterial synthesis for soil-plant systems, food safety, and sustainability. Science of The Total Environment, 171862.
• Mittal, D., Kaur, G., Singh, P., Yadav, K., & Ali, S. A. (2020). Nanoparticle-based sustainable agriculture and food science: Recent advances and future outlook. Frontiers in Nanotechnology, 2, 579954.
• Iavicoli, I., Leso, V., Beezhold, D. H., & Shvedova, A. A. (2017). Nanotechnology in agriculture: Opportunities, toxicological implications, and occupational risks. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 329, 96-111.
• Teklu, B. M., Hailu, A., Wiegant, D. A., Scholten, B. S., & Van den Brink, P. J. (2018). Impacts of nutrients and pesticides from small-and large-scale agriculture on the water quality of Lake Ziway, Ethiopia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 13207-13216.
• Datta, S., Singh, J., Singh, S., & Singh, J. (2016). Earthworms, pesticides and sustainable agriculture: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(9), 8227-8243.
• Li, L., Zou, D., Xiao, Z., Zeng, X., Zhang, L., Jiang, L., & Liu, F. (2019). Biochar as a sorbent for emerging contaminants enables improvements in waste management and sustainable resource use. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1324-1342.
• Singh, J. S., Pandey, V. C., & Singh, D. P. (2011). Efficient soil microorganisms: a new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 140(3-4), 339-353.
• Wang, Dengjun, et al. “Nano-enabled pesticides for sustainable agriculture and global food security.” Nature nanotechnology 17.4 (2022): 347-360.