Review Guidelines

1. The research has not previously been published (in whole or in part) or is not expected to be published elsewhere (except in an abstract or as part of a published lecture or scientific thesis); we will consider manuscripts stored on prepress servers such as arXiv or published in institutional repositories. Articles presented at conferences are also included (a significant number of changes and mandatory citations of the conference report must be made before submission to the journal). Submission of manuscripts indicates that the authors permit publishing the article and calling themselves the original editor. The submitting author (correspondent author) is responsible for ensuring that all other co-authors approve the article’s publication and that no copyright disputes are discussed after the publication of the article. The respective authors are also responsible for ensuring that articles from a specific institution are submitted with the approval of the requested institution.

2. All authors have permission to publish. Once the publication is accepted, it will not be transferred anywhere else, in English or any other language, without written permission from the copyright owner. The magazine can translate the text of previously published stories into another language. In this case, you must first obtain the author’s consent who published the manuscript and, when submitting it, make it clear that the manuscript has already been published and describe it in an overview.

3.Authors must ensure that no material submitted as part of the manuscript infringes on existing copyrights or the rights of third parties.

4. The respective authors retain the copyrights of all papers published in this journal as per the ‘Creative Commons Attribution License’ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The author(s) should be the sole author(s) of the article and should have full authority to agree and in granting rights (if any) which are not in breach of any other obligation. The author(s) should ensure the integrity of the paper and related works. Authors should mandatorily ensure that submission of the manuscript to this journal would result in no breach of contract or of confidence or commitment given to secrecy.

5. If a submitted study replicates or is very similar to previous work, authors must provide a sound scientific rationale for the submitted work and reference and discuss the existing literature. Submissions that replicate or are derivative of existing work will likely be rejected if authors do not provide adequate justification.

6. English quality: The language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. The author’s responsibility is to improve the English quality (if required) by any other third party service.

7. The research must meet all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity.

8. This publisher believes that no manuscript should be rejected only based on ‘lack of Novelty’, provided the manuscript is sufficiently robust and technically sound. Too often, a journal’s decision to publish a paper is dominated by what the Editor/reviewer thinks is interesting and will gain greater readership — both of which are subjective judgments and lead to frustrating decisions and delay the publication. The journals will rigorously peer-review your submissions and publish all papers judged to be technically sound. Judgments about the importance of any particular paper are then made after publication by the readership (who are the most qualified to determine what is of interest to them).