Deciphering the Physicochemical Interplay of Pesticides: Implications for Soil and Water Management

---

Manjeet Paras¹ , Atul Sharma² , Harsh Vardhan ³ , Yagyavalkya Sharma³ , Riya Agrahari⁴ , Komal Sharma⁵

¹Department of Zoology Agra College Agra, Dr. B.R Ambedkar University Agra.

²Department of Zoology, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University Agra, UP-India

³Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Kalp Laboratories, Mathura, UP-India

⁴Unit of Research and Development, Kalp Research Work, Mathura, UP-India

⁵Department of Agricultural Science, Kalp Research Work, Mathura, UP-India

Corresponding Author Email: mr.sharmaatul@yahoo.in

DOI : https://doi.org/10.51470/AGRI.2024.3.2.01

Abstract

Keywords

Download this article as:

---

Introduction

Pesticides play a crucial role in modern agriculture by safeguarding crops against pests, diseases, and weeds, thereby ensuring global food security and supporting agricultural development. However, the indiscriminate use of pesticides raises significant concerns regarding their environmental impact, particularly on soil and water quality [1]. Understanding the physicochemical behavior of pesticides is paramount for devising effective management strategies to mitigate adverse environmental effects while maximizing agricultural productivity. Pesticides represent a cornerstone of modern agriculture, contributing significantly to global food production by controlling pests, diseases, and weeds. The widespread use of pesticides has undoubtedly enhanced crop yields and protected agricultural investments [2-3]. However, the indiscriminate application and persistence of pesticides in the environment raise profound concerns regarding their impact on soil and water ecosystems. The dynamic interplay between pesticides and the environment is governed by complex physicochemical processes that dictate their behavior, transport, and fate. Understanding these processes is essential for developing sustainable agricultural practices that safeguard both productivity and environmental integrity. In this context, this review aims to explore the intricate physicochemical interactions of pesticides in soil and water systems and their implications for effective management strategies.

By examining the physicochemical properties of pesticides and their interactions with soil constituents, we can gain insights into their sorption, desorption, degradation, and mobility dynamics [4-5]. These processes profoundly influence the persistence, bioavailability, and environmental fate of pesticides, shaping their potential impacts on soil quality, groundwater contamination, and aquatic ecosystems. Moreover, the management of pesticides in agricultural systems requires a holistic approach that considers factors such as pesticide formulation, application methods, soil characteristics, climate conditions, and regulatory frameworks. Sustainable soil and water management practices, including integrated pest management (IPM), soil conservation techniques, and precision agriculture, offer promising avenues for minimizing pesticide-related environmental risks while optimizing agricultural productivity [6].

Through a comprehensive understanding of the physicochemical behavior of pesticides, coupled with informed decision-making and collaborative efforts among stakeholders, we can aspire to achieve a balance between agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability [7]. This review aims to synthesize current knowledge, identify knowledge gaps, and offer recommendations for advancing research and policy initiatives aimed at promoting responsible pesticide use and environmental stewardship in agriculture, exploring the physicochemical dynamics of pesticides in soil and water systems provides a foundation for developing evidence-based strategies to mitigate environmental impacts and foster sustainable agricultural practices [8]. By addressing these challenges collectively, we can strive towards a future where agriculture coexists harmoniously with the natural environment, ensuring food security and ecological resilience for generations to come.

Figure 1 illustrates the multifaceted effects of organic amendments, including Solid Organic Matter (SOM) and Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM), on the processes governing the fate of pesticides in soil environments. SOM, represented in the figure, influences pesticide sorption dynamics by altering the surface properties of soil particles and providing binding sites for pesticide molecules. Additionally, SOM can either enhance or inhibit pesticide degradation processes depending on its composition and interactions with soil microbial communities. Its contribution to soil structure and aggregation affects pesticide mobility and availability, influencing their persistence and potential for leaching. On the other hand, DOM plays a crucial role in pesticide transport within soil matrices, affecting their mobility and potential for groundwater contamination. The availability of DOM also influences microbial activity in soil, thereby influencing pesticide degradation rates. The interaction between organic amendments and pesticide properties, including solubility and chemical structure, further modulates pesticide fate in soil environments. Understanding these complex interactions is essential for developing sustainable pesticide management strategies that minimize environmental risks while promoting soil health and productivity. Incorporating organic amendments into soil management practices can help mitigate the adverse effects of pesticides and promote environmentally responsible agricultural practices with copyright permission from MDPI  and adopted from the Ref [1] .

Physicochemical Interactions in Soil

The fate and behavior of pesticides in soil are influenced by a myriad of physicochemical processes, including sorption, desorption, degradation, and transport. Sorption, the attachment of pesticides to soil particles, is governed by factors such as pesticide properties (e.g., hydrophobicity, polarity), soil characteristics (e.g., organic matter content, clay mineralogy), and environmental conditions (e.g., pH, temperature). Desorption, the release of pesticides from soil particles, is influenced by competing ions, soil moisture, and microbial activity [9]. Physicochemical interactions in soil encompass a range of complex processes that dictate the behavior and fate of pesticides within the soil matrix. These interactions are influenced by various factors, including the physicochemical properties of both the pesticides and the soil itself, as well as environmental conditions. Some key aspects of physicochemical interactions in soil include:

1. Sorption: Sorption refers to the adsorption of pesticides onto soil particles. It is primarily governed by the chemical properties of the pesticide molecules, such as their polarity, hydrophobicity, and molecular size, as well as the properties of the soil, including its organic matter content, clay mineralogy, and cation exchange capacity. Sorption is a critical process that influences the mobility and bioavailability of pesticides in the soil.

2. Desorption: Desorption is the release of pesticides from soil particles back into the soil solution. It is influenced by factors such as soil moisture content, pH, temperature, and the presence of competing ions. Desorption is a reversible process that affects the availability of pesticides for plant uptake, microbial degradation, and leaching into groundwater.

3. Degradation: Pesticide degradation refers to the breakdown of pesticide molecules into smaller, less toxic compounds. Degradation can occur through both chemical and biological processes, including hydrolysis, photolysis, and microbial degradation. Soil microorganisms play a crucial role in pesticide degradation, utilizing pesticides as a carbon source for energy and growth. The rate and extent of pesticide degradation depend on factors such as soil moisture, temperature, pH, organic matter content, and the chemical structure of the pesticide molecule.

4. Mobility: Pesticide mobility in soil refers to the movement of pesticides through the soil profile via processes such as diffusion, advection, and preferential flow. The mobility of pesticides is influenced by their physicochemical properties, as well as soil characteristics such as texture, structure, compaction, and hydraulic conductivity. Pesticides that are highly soluble, have low sorption affinity, or are persistent in the soil may exhibit greater mobility and have a higher potential for leaching into groundwater or runoff into surface water bodies.

Overall, understanding the physicochemical interactions of pesticides in soil is essential for predicting their behavior, assessing environmental risks, and developing effective soil management practices to mitigate pesticide contamination and protect soil and water quality.

Pesticide Degradation and Mobility

Pesticide degradation, either through chemical or microbial processes, determines their persistence and potential for environmental contamination. Degradation rates vary widely depending on pesticide type, formulation, and environmental conditions [10]. While some pesticides undergo rapid degradation, others exhibit greater persistence, posing long-term risks to soil and water quality. Pesticide mobility, influenced by soil structure, texture, and hydraulic properties, dictates their potential to leach into groundwater or runoff into surface water bodies. Pesticide degradation and mobility are critical aspects of pesticide behavior in the environment, particularly in soil systems. Here’s an overview of pesticide degradation and mobility:

1. Degradation: Pesticide degradation refers to the process by which pesticides break down into simpler compounds over time. Degradation can occur through various mechanisms, including chemical, biological, and photochemical processes [11].

Chemical degradation: Chemical degradation involves reactions such as hydrolysis, oxidation, and photolysis, where pesticides degrade in response to environmental factors like pH, temperature, and sunlight exposure [12].

Biological degradation: Biological degradation involves the breakdown of pesticides by microorganisms present in the soil. Soil bacteria, fungi, and other microorganisms utilize pesticides as a source of carbon and energy, facilitating their degradation into non-toxic metabolites [13].

Environmental factors: Environmental factors such as soil moisture, temperature, pH, and organic matter content influence the rate and extent of pesticide degradation. Optimal conditions for microbial activity, such as warm and moist soils with neutral pH, promote faster pesticide degradation [14].

2. Mobility: Pesticide mobility refers to the ability of pesticides to move through the soil profile and potentially reach groundwater or surface water bodies. The mobility of pesticides is influenced by their physical and chemical properties, as well as soil characteristics and environmental conditions [15].

Physical properties: Pesticides with high water solubility and low adsorption affinity to soil particles are more mobile and prone to leaching through the soil profile. Conversely, pesticides with low water solubility and high adsorption affinity tend to be less mobile and more likely to adhere to soil particles [16].

Soil characteristics: Soil texture, structure, organic matter content, and permeability influence pesticide mobility. Sandy soils with low organic matter content and high permeability allow pesticides to move more freely compared to clayey soils with high organic matter content [17].

Environmental factors: Environmental factors such as rainfall intensity, irrigation practices, slope gradient, and depth to groundwater also affect pesticide mobility. Heavy rainfall or over-irrigation can increase the risk of pesticide leaching, particularly in vulnerable areas with shallow groundwater [18]. Understanding pesticide degradation and mobility is essential for assessing environmental risks, designing effective pesticide management strategies, and protecting soil and water quality. By promoting sustainable agricultural practices and minimizing pesticide usage, we can mitigate the potential adverse impacts of pesticides on the environment and human health.

Implications for Soil and Water Management:

Understanding the physicochemical behavior of pesticides is essential for developing sustainable soil and water management practices. Integrated pest management (IPM) strategies, emphasizing judicious pesticide use, crop rotation, and biological control, can minimize pesticide reliance and reduce environmental risks. Soil conservation practices, such as conservation tillage and cover cropping, enhance soil structure and reduce erosion, thereby limiting pesticide runoff and protecting water quality [19]. The implications of pesticide behavior in soil and water systems are far-reaching and necessitate careful considerations for effective soil and water management strategies. Here are some key implications:

1. Soil Health and Productivity: Pesticides can have both positive and negative effects on soil health and productivity. While pesticides control pests and diseases, excessive or indiscriminate use can disrupt soil microbial communities, decrease organic matter content, and compromise soil structure. Sustainable soil management practices such as crop rotation, cover cropping, and reduced tillage can mitigate the adverse effects of pesticides and promote soil health and fertility.

2. Water Quality Protection: Pesticide runoff and leaching pose significant threats to water quality in surface water bodies and groundwater reservoirs. Waterborne pesticides can contaminate drinking water sources, disrupt aquatic ecosystems, and harm non-target organisms. Implementing buffer zones, vegetative barriers, and riparian buffers can help mitigate pesticide runoff and protect water quality [20].

3. Groundwater Contamination: Pesticides with high mobility and persistence in soil pose a particularly high risk of leaching into groundwater aquifers. Once pesticides infiltrate groundwater, they can persist for extended periods and accumulate to levels exceeding regulatory limits. Groundwater monitoring programs, wellhead protection initiatives, and aquifer recharge management are essential for preventing groundwater contamination and ensuring safe drinking water supplies.

4. Regulatory Compliance and Best Practices: Effective soil and water management require adherence to regulatory guidelines and best management practices for pesticide use. Regulatory agencies establish pesticide registration, labeling, and application guidelines to minimize environmental risks and protect human health. Educating farmers, applicators, and agricultural stakeholders on integrated pest management (IPM) principles, pesticide handling procedures, and environmental stewardship practices is critical for promoting responsible pesticide use and compliance with regulatory requirements [21].

5. Research and Innovation: Continued research and innovation are essential for developing sustainable solutions to mitigate the environmental impacts of pesticides on soil and water systems. Research efforts should focus on exploring alternative pest management strategies, developing eco-friendly pesticide formulations, and enhancing soil and water conservation practices [22-23]. Collaboration between scientists, policymakers, industry stakeholders, and agricultural practitioners is key to driving innovation and implementing evidence-based solutions for soil and water management, addressing the implications of pesticide behavior in soil and water systems requires a multifaceted approach that integrates scientific research, regulatory oversight, education, and stakeholder engagement. By implementing sustainable soil and water management practices, promoting regulatory compliance, and fostering innovation, we can mitigate the adverse effects of pesticides on the environment and safeguard soil and water resources for future generations.

Conclusion

The physicochemical interplay of pesticides in soil and water environments underscores the need for interdisciplinary research, regulatory interventions, and stakeholder collaboration to promote sustainable agricultural practices. By prioritizing soil and water conservation efforts and adopting innovative approaches to pesticide management, we can mitigate environmental risks while ensuring the long-term viability of agricultural systems, the intricate dynamics of pesticide behavior in soil and water systems underscore the critical importance of adopting holistic and sustainable approaches to pesticide management. Throughout this exploration, we have delved into the physicochemical interactions, degradation processes, mobility patterns, and implications for soil and water management associated with pesticide use in agricultural settings.

The implications of pesticide behavior extend beyond agricultural fields, impacting soil health, water quality, and ecosystem integrity. While pesticides play a crucial role in pest control and crop protection, their indiscriminate use can lead to adverse environmental consequences, including soil degradation, groundwater contamination, and ecological disruption. Effective pesticide management strategies must prioritize the protection of soil and water resources while ensuring the sustainability of agricultural production systems. Sustainable soil management practices, such as crop rotation, conservation tillage, and organic amendments, promote soil health and resilience, reducing the reliance on pesticides. Furthermore, integrated pest management (IPM) approaches, which emphasize biological control, cultural practices, and targeted pesticide application, offer viable alternatives to conventional pesticide use. By minimizing pesticide inputs and adopting IPM strategies, farmers can mitigate environmental risks while maintaining crop productivity and profitability.

Regulatory measures, including pesticide registration, labeling requirements, and pesticide use restrictions, play a crucial role in safeguarding environmental and human health. Continued monitoring, research, and innovation are essential for identifying emerging pesticide threats, developing safer alternatives, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices. Ultimately, addressing the complex challenges posed by pesticide use requires collaboration among policymakers, scientists, agricultural practitioners, and community stakeholders. By fostering a culture of environmental stewardship, promoting education and awareness, and investing in sustainable agricultural practices, we can cultivate a future where agriculture coexists harmoniously with the natural environment, by integrating scientific knowledge, regulatory oversight, and community engagement, we can mitigate the environmental impacts of pesticides and ensure the long-term health and sustainability of soil and water resources for future generations, addressing the complex challenges posed by pesticide use requires a concerted effort to integrate scientific knowledge, policy frameworks, and community engagement. By embracing sustainable practices and fostering resilience in agroecosystems, we can strive towards a harmonious balance between agricultural productivity and environmental stewardship.

References

1. Carpio, M.J.; Sánchez-Martín, M.J.; Rodríguez-Cruz, M.S.; Marín-Benito, J.M. Effect of Organic Residues on Pesticide Behavior in Soils: A Review of Laboratory Research. Environments 2021, 8, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8040032
2. Chaplain, V., Mamy, L., Vieublé, L., Mougin, C., Benoit, P., Barriuso, E., & Nélieu, S. (2011). Fate of pesticides in soils: Toward an integrated approach of influential factors.
3. Kookana, R. S., Baskaran, S. N. R. S. N. R., & Naidu, R. (1998). Pesticide fate and behaviour in Australian soils in relation to contamination and management of soil and water: a review. Soil Research, 36(5), 715-764.
4. Shirzadi, A., Simpson, M. J., Kumar, R., Baer, A. J., Xu, Y., & Simpson, A. J. (2008). Molecular interactions of pesticides at the soil− water interface. Environmental science & technology, 42(15), 5514-5520.
5. Mohamed, A. M. O., & Paleologos, E. K. (2017). Fundamentals of geoenvironmental engineering: understanding soil, water, and pollutant interaction and transport. Butterworth-Heinemann.
6. Khalid, S., Shahid, M., Murtaza, B., Bibi, I., Naeem, M. A., & Niazi, N. K. (2020). A critical review of different factors governing the fate of pesticides in soil under biochar application. Science of the Total Environment, 711, 134645.
7. Plakas, K. V., & Karabelas, A. J. (2012). Removal of pesticides from water by NF and RO membranes—A review. Desalination, 287, 255-265.
8. Ossai, I. C., Ahmed, A., Hassan, A., & Hamid, F. S. (2020). Remediation of soil and water contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon: A review. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 17, 100526.
9. Malik, Z., Ahmad, M., Abassi, G. H., Dawood, M., Hussain, A., & Jamil, M. (2017). Agrochemicals and soil microbes: interaction for soil health. Xenobiotics in the Soil Environment: Monitoring, Toxicity and Management, 139-152.
10. Boivin, A., Cherrier, R., & Schiavon, M. (2005). A comparison of five pesticides adsorption and desorption processes in thirteen contrasting field soils. Chemosphere, 61(5), 668-676.
11. Gangola, S., Bhatt, P., Kumar, A. J., Bhandari, G., Joshi, S., Punetha, A.. & Rene, E. R. (2022). Biotechnological tools to elucidate the mechanism of pesticide degradation in the environment. Chemosphere, 296, 133916.
12. Ahmed, N., & Al-Mutairi, K. A. (2022). Earthworms effect on microbial population and soil fertility as well as their interaction with agriculture practices. Sustainability, 14(13), 7803.
13. Kurwadkar, S. T., Dewinne, D., Wheat, R., McGahan, D. G., & Mitchell, F. L. (2013). Time dependent sorption behavior of dinotefuran, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 48(4), 237-242.
14. Okigbo, B. N. (2020). Sustainable agricultural systems in tropical Africa. In Sustainable agricultural systems (pp. 323-352). CRC Press.
15. Zalidis, G., Stamatiadis, S., Takavakoglou, V., Eskridge, K., & Misopolinos, N. (2002). Impacts of agricultural practices on soil and water quality in the Mediterranean region and proposed assessment methodology. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 88(2), 137-146.
16. Spark, K. M., & Swift, R. S. (2002). Effect of soil composition and dissolved organic matter on pesticide sorption. Science of the Total Environment, 298(1-3), 147-161.
17. Green, R. E. (1974). Pesticide‐clay‐water interactions. Pesticides in soil and water, 3-37.
18. Tale, K. S., & Ingole, S. (2015). A review on role of physico-chemical properties in soil quality. Chemical Science Review and Letters, 4(13), 57-66.
19. Tripathi, S., Srivastava, P., Devi, R. S., & Bhadouria, R. (2020). Influence of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides on soil health and soil microbiology. In Agrochemicals detection, treatment and remediation (pp. 25-54). Butterworth-Heinemann.
20. Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D.. & Ok, Y. S. (2014). Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere, 99, 19-33.
21. Thakur, M., Praveen, S., Divte, P. R., Mitra, R., Kumar, M., Gupta, C. K.. & Singh, B. (2022). Metal tolerance in plants: Molecular and physicochemical interface determines the “not so heavy effect” of heavy metals. Chemosphere, 287, 131957.
22. Nikhil Agnihotri (2023). Understanding the Physicochemical Behavior of Pesticides in Soil and Water. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51470/AGRI.2023.2.2.22
23. Karlen, D. L., Mausbach, M. J., Doran, J. W., Cline, R. G., Harris, R. F., & Schuman, G. E. (1997). Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest editorial). Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61(1), 4-10.